<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ardekantur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ardekantur.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com</link>
	<description>A blog about computer science, Ruby, .NET, and other fun things on the edge of software engineering.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My Adventures with Entity Framework and Oracle by Oystein</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/my-adventures-with-entity-framework-and-oracle/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Oystein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=110#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You should take a look at Devarts Oracle Entity Framework Provider. http://devart.com/oranet/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should take a look at Devarts Oracle Entity Framework Provider. <a href="http://devart.com/oranet/" rel="nofollow">http://devart.com/oranet/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Awesome Mac App Alert: Hyperspaces by Tony Arnold</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/06/awesome-mac-app-alert-hyperspaces/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/archives/90#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the kind words - if you'd like to get in on the private beta, just send me an e-mail! I'm expecting to have a public beta out this month (for real this time!).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words - if you&#8217;d like to get in on the private beta, just send me an e-mail! I&#8217;m expecting to have a public beta out this month (for real this time!).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Adventures with Entity Framework and Oracle by Ardekantur</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/my-adventures-with-entity-framework-and-oracle/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardekantur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=110#comment-985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jason -&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't mean to conflate the issues I had with EFOracleProvider with the issues I had with Entity Framework. I fully recognize EFOracleProvider as completely alpha, untested, non-comprehensive code. But I take issue with the difficulty with which Entity Framework finally clicked for me, including the need of a command-line based utility to generate code, the three separate metadata files, and so on. This is why I mention Ruby at the end of the post. Independent of the database, there are ORMs that make it straightforward to map your model to your database. I wish ardently for Entity Framework to be this kind of ORM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to voice your criticism. In retrospect, my work with Entity Framework should have been split up into two posts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason -</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t mean to conflate the issues I had with EFOracleProvider with the issues I had with Entity Framework. I fully recognize EFOracleProvider as completely alpha, untested, non-comprehensive code. But I take issue with the difficulty with which Entity Framework finally clicked for me, including the need of a command-line based utility to generate code, the three separate metadata files, and so on. This is why I mention Ruby at the end of the post. Independent of the database, there are ORMs that make it straightforward to map your model to your database. I wish ardently for Entity Framework to be this kind of ORM.</p>

<p>Thanks for taking the time to voice your criticism. In retrospect, my work with Entity Framework should have been split up into two posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Adventures with Entity Framework and Oracle by Jaroslaw Kowalski [MSFT]</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/my-adventures-with-entity-framework-and-oracle/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaroslaw Kowalski [MSFT]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=110#comment-984</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for giving EFOracleProvider a try. Let me point out some things:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've made the decision to quote all table and column names in generated SQL in order to support all existing databases with mixed-case column and table names. Unfortunately unquoted identifiers are translated to uppercase by Oracle, which makes dealing with them a bit unpleasant as you have noticed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The recommended way to deal with uppercaseness of Oracle in EFv1 is to use MSL to map nice-looking property names in your conceptual model (CSDL) to all-caps names in storage schema SSDL. We generally don't envision majority of people working directly on SSDL and re-generating CSDL/MSL every time database changes (which leads to suboptimal class and property names), but that's definitely a possibility. In this case, you can think of writing a post-processor to CSDL/MSL files which will adjust the casing of properties as required. However, I would recommend maintaining CSDL/MSL by hand and re-generating SSDL from the database.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Namespace attribute of Schema is there just to qualify entity type names. We typically use "ModelName.Store" convention, but "Administration" will also works fine.  Fully qualified SSDL type names ("TestAppEFModel.Administration.Assets" in your case) are not used outside of SSDL, but the namespace is used for store-specific functions declared in SSDL, so you may want to keep this simple and readable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing out the INSTR and ROWNUM issues. I'll try to fix those issues and post the updated version soon. As stated in the documentation, the provider did not undergo rigorous testing and is there mostly for educational purposes and should not be used in any production environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding Ruby: In EFv2 we are working on improving our developer experiences by introducing more convention-based mappings and POCO object support. We are always open to suggestions and ideas that might improve the final product. We have recently opened up our design process - feel free to comment on our design blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/efdesign/. Or you can just contact me directly at jaroslaw @dot@ kowalski @at@ microsoft @dot@ com.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jarek&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for giving EFOracleProvider a try. Let me point out some things:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>We&#8217;ve made the decision to quote all table and column names in generated SQL in order to support all existing databases with mixed-case column and table names. Unfortunately unquoted identifiers are translated to uppercase by Oracle, which makes dealing with them a bit unpleasant as you have noticed.</p></li>
<li><p>The recommended way to deal with uppercaseness of Oracle in EFv1 is to use MSL to map nice-looking property names in your conceptual model (CSDL) to all-caps names in storage schema SSDL. We generally don&#8217;t envision majority of people working directly on SSDL and re-generating CSDL/MSL every time database changes (which leads to suboptimal class and property names), but that&#8217;s definitely a possibility. In this case, you can think of writing a post-processor to CSDL/MSL files which will adjust the casing of properties as required. However, I would recommend maintaining CSDL/MSL by hand and re-generating SSDL from the database.</p></li>
<li><p>The Namespace attribute of Schema is there just to qualify entity type names. We typically use &#8220;ModelName.Store&#8221; convention, but &#8220;Administration&#8221; will also works fine.  Fully qualified SSDL type names (&#8221;TestAppEFModel.Administration.Assets&#8221; in your case) are not used outside of SSDL, but the namespace is used for store-specific functions declared in SSDL, so you may want to keep this simple and readable.</p></li>
<li><p>Thanks for pointing out the INSTR and ROWNUM issues. I&#8217;ll try to fix those issues and post the updated version soon. As stated in the documentation, the provider did not undergo rigorous testing and is there mostly for educational purposes and should not be used in any production environment.</p></li>
<li><p>Regarding Ruby: In EFv2 we are working on improving our developer experiences by introducing more convention-based mappings and POCO object support. We are always open to suggestions and ideas that might improve the final product. We have recently opened up our design process - feel free to comment on our design blog: <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/efdesign/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/efdesign/</a>. Or you can just contact me directly at jaroslaw @dot@ kowalski @at@ microsoft @dot@ com.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Jarek</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Adventures with Entity Framework and Oracle by Jason Short</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/my-adventures-with-entity-framework-and-oracle/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=110#comment-983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your not really fair to the EF here.  You are complaining that the EF doesn't work and that you have a ton of bad generated SQL.  That is ENTIRELY up to the EF provider (in your case the not for production code you linked for a sample provider).  The EF has nothing to do with all those problems you saw above - it all comes down to the EF Provider.  And yes, Oracle will have a lot of work to do.  But they can do it (and I think they publicly have already announced it).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your not really fair to the EF here.  You are complaining that the EF doesn&#8217;t work and that you have a ton of bad generated SQL.  That is ENTIRELY up to the EF provider (in your case the not for production code you linked for a sample provider).  The EF has nothing to do with all those problems you saw above - it all comes down to the EF Provider.  And yes, Oracle will have a lot of work to do.  But they can do it (and I think they publicly have already announced it).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generating Multiple RSpec Files from a Design Document by Ardekantur</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/generating-multiple-rspec-files-from-a-design-document/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardekantur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=113#comment-980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't taken a look at Thor, but maybe I could do something like that. Honestly I was thinking something along the lines of sake, for GitHub. But we'll see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t taken a look at Thor, but maybe I could do something like that. Honestly I was thinking something along the lines of sake, for GitHub. But we&#8217;ll see what happens.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generating Multiple RSpec Files from a Design Document by Soleone</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/08/generating-multiple-rspec-files-from-a-design-document/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Soleone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=113#comment-978</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds useful! How about making it a Thor task instead of a Rake task, so it's available system wide and can be updated nicely? At the moment you have to create the rakefile in each new project where you want to use it, right?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds useful! How about making it a Thor task instead of a Rake task, so it&#8217;s available system wide and can be updated nicely? At the moment you have to create the rakefile in each new project where you want to use it, right?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tasko/TaskPaper + Ruby = Awesome by The Real Adam &#8211; Sync your&#160;TaskPapers</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/07/taskotaskpaper-ruby-awesome/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Adam &#8211; Sync your&#160;TaskPapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/?p=97#comment-977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] that makes sense and doesn&#8217;t throw huge amounts of UI at me. Ergo, I&#8217;m pleased to see a Ruby library for syncing your TaskPaper documents to what will soon become the web version of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that makes sense and doesn&#8217;t throw huge amounts of UI at me. Ergo, I&#8217;m pleased to see a Ruby library for syncing your TaskPaper documents to what will soon become the web version of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Still Refuse To Use Pixelmator Part II by Ardekantur</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/07/why-i-still-refuse-to-use-pixelmator-part-ii/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardekantur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/archives/101#comment-966</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Seraphiel! I downloaded the latest version just yesterday and found that feature. I subscribed to the Pixelmator podcast and hope to plow through them this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now if only some decent layer alignment and vector tools were added, I could be happy :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Seraphiel! I downloaded the latest version just yesterday and found that feature. I subscribed to the Pixelmator podcast and hope to plow through them this weekend.</p>

<p>Now if only some decent layer alignment and vector tools were added, I could be happy :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Still Refuse To Use Pixelmator Part II by Seraphiel</title>
		<link>http://blog.ardekantur.com/2008/07/why-i-still-refuse-to-use-pixelmator-part-ii/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Seraphiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ardekantur.com/archives/101#comment-965</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is already a new an improved lasso tool. The polygonal lasso tool so you don't have to hold the mouse-button and get tired anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dont forget the new and cool Pixelmator tutorials that came out recently as well. That are available in iTunes to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://web.me.com/sebvdv/PixelmatorTutorials/Podcast/Podcast.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=284768359&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a new an improved lasso tool. The polygonal lasso tool so you don&#8217;t have to hold the mouse-button and get tired anymore.</p>

<p>Dont forget the new and cool Pixelmator tutorials that came out recently as well. That are available in iTunes to.</p>

<p><a href="http://web.me.com/sebvdv/PixelmatorTutorials/Podcast/Podcast.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.me.com/sebvdv/PixelmatorTutorials/Podcast/Podcast.html</a></p>

<p><a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=284768359" rel="nofollow">http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=284768359</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->
